Balancing Khami Ins!

[Coalz101]

Alright, seeing as tanks do most of the carrying on khami ins can we simply remove the abrams, keep the bradleys and see how that works out? I mean bradley can kill the t62 before it reloads (Provided gunner doesn't miss) so why do we need abrams?

CAS is fine, A10 is a big slow boy and it being alongside the Kiowas they both easily be clapped by a well positioned AAV.

[_Gabo]

Originally Posted by Coalz101

Alright, seeing as tanks do most of the carrying on khami ins can we simply remove the abrams, keep the bradleys and see how that works out? I mean bradley can kill the t62 before it reloads (Provided gunner doesn't miss) so why do we need abrams?

CAS is fine, A10 is a big slow boy and it being alongside the Kiowas they both easily be clapped by a well positioned AAV.

I think that even modernizing the T62 would be a good way to balance this, but even so I think the abrams are very strong on this map, since to bring down a T62 only a Bradley is necessary.

[WingWalker]

We have a discussion in the MAP FEEDBACK section on exactly this, the balance issues with Kam.

Basically, great map, but MEC gets pinned down at the river.

[InfantryGamer42]

Originally Posted by WingWalker

We have a discussion in the MAP FEEDBACK section on exactly this, the balance issues with Kam.

Basically, great map, but MEC gets pinned down at the river.

It is more complicated when we talk about INS. Just check asset list in first place. 2x T-62 vs 2x M1A2 Abrams tanks is not really fun experience.

[LimitJK]

how about INS INF layout.

revolving around a long range recon type formation akin to HBOs generation kill.

US:
2x humvee mk19
4x humvee uparmored
normal humvees and trans humvees in a healthy mix + logis
2x huey
1x kiowa ATGM (10 min respawn)

maybe TOW humvee (1)

MEC
mostly mobility assets (trucks, UAZs (only very few with dshk), trans heli)
1x tank (one of the slow ones)
1x bmp 1
1x shilka (10 min)

explanation:
no thermal assets that completely dominate the map (especially no CROWs anything).

mk 19 humvee allows area supression for pushes, while still being vulnerable.

kiowa deals with the heavier stuff without dominating outside of its domain.
tow humvee if that isnt enough.

[Iguanadjy]

Originally Posted by LimitJK

how about INS INF layout.

revolving around a long range recon type formation akin to HBOs generation kill.

US:
2x humvee mk19
4x humvee uparmored
normal humvees and trans humvees in a healthy mix + logis
2x huey
1x kiowa ATGM (10 min respawn)

maybe TOW humvee (1)

MEC
mostly mobility assets (trucks, UAZs (only very few with dshk), trans heli)
1x tank (one of the slow ones)
1x bmp 1
1x shilka (10 min)

explanation:
no thermal assets that completely dominate the map (especially no CROWs anything).

mk 19 humvee allows area supression for pushes, while still being vulnerable.

kiowa deals with the heavier stuff without dominating outside of its domain.
tow humvee if that isnt enough.

Gotta love that formula indeed! Seems pretty dope!

[[R-CON]​Fastjack]

Originally Posted by LimitJK

how about INS INF layout.

revolving around a long range recon type formation akin to HBOs generation kill.

US:
2x humvee mk19
4x humvee uparmored
normal humvees and trans humvees in a healthy mix + logis
2x huey
1x kiowa ATGM (10 min respawn)

maybe TOW humvee (1)

MEC
mostly mobility assets (trucks, UAZs (only very few with dshk), trans heli)
1x tank (one of the slow ones)
1x bmp 1
1x shilka (10 min)

explanation:
no thermal assets that completely dominate the map (especially no CROWs anything).

mk 19 humvee allows area supression for pushes, while still being vulnerable.

kiowa deals with the heavier stuff without dominating outside of its domain.
tow humvee if that isnt enough.

I like this asset layout too. Missing only the support vehicles for supplies but i think that's standard.

[WingWalker]

Originally Posted by Coalz101

Alright, seeing as tanks do most of the carrying on khami ins can we simply remove the abrams, keep the bradleys and see how that works out? I mean bradley can kill the t62 before it reloads (Provided gunner doesn't miss) so why do we need abrams?

CAS is fine, A10 is a big slow boy and it being alongside the Kiowas they both easily be clapped by a well positioned AAV.

You really have not stated any problem you see on this map. Have not given any example of what you have experienced, and said why that was bad and not just a circumstance of that one match up.

All I get from your post is that you just want it easier?

[Coalz101]

Originally Posted by WingWalker

You really have not stated any problem you see on this map. Have not given any example of what you have experienced, and said why that was bad and not just a circumstance of that one match up.

All I get from your post is that you just want it easier?

We're talking about Khami Insurgency specifically which no one needs to explain how its unbalanced asset wise. How do you expect 2 t62s and a bmp 1 to fight 2 abrams and a bradley in the open desert? When the entire US arsenal shoots twice as fast. and they have 3 cas assets. It's obviously unfair. The US only needs 1 good asset squad to win the match, whether it be cas tanks or apc. CAS can kill anything, Bradley can 1 v 1 tanks and win because of the number of atgms it can fire in a short period, and tanks is self explanatory.


Khami AAS is fine, if one of the teams are bad then they will obviously lose the game. the Assets on Khami AAS is already so balanced the way it is, MEC even has a some what advantage on the alt layer (2 migs and froggie vs f15 f16 and a10) still even compared to when it use to be 4 (2 migs fitter and froggie) v 3 (f16 f15 a10).

[[R-DEV]Mats391]

So Kashan Infranty? https://www.realitymod.com/mapgaller...sert/gpm_cq/16