2021-02-28, 14:01 | #11 | |
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 344
United States of America
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
Seems your are mostly talking about playing INS?
Too much here to respond too, will just post in his quote... Quote:
| |
2021-03-01, 10:07 | #12 | |
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 150
Benelux
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
Quote:
Yes, because somehow the bullet feels the innate skill of the sniper and this moves it out of the barrel faster. . IRL, snipers are trained to hit chest, not to hit someone's heart or pick out different vitals. There is literally deviation in this game. The ironsight rifle has more deviation than the sniper. Of course, because this game is REALISTIC (except on damage values) that deviation is only something like 4 MOA for the ironsight, which is 11.6cm at 100 meters. So it's perfectly possible to hit someone in the chest, as it is in real life (may I remind you that the ironsights of the mosin go from 100 meters to 2km). But somehow this deviation isn't enough for you. What you're saying is just numerically wrong. I don't know what range you're talking about, but I'd say that if your arm is about 33 cm from your chest, an ironsight mosin with a terrible MOA of 4 will only hit the arm at 300m, and will hit chest at any range below that. What you want, and what the game currently does, is say that every ironsight mosin has half the propellant blow out the back, but adding a scope magically fixes this. If we extend your logic to other kits, engineers/HAT kits should do 2x damage when manning the TOW, breachers should do more damage in full auto, only crewman should do 200 damage when manning the 50 cal, etc.... | |
2021-03-02, 00:44 | #13 |
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 182
United States of America
Location: Texas
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
I think the Mosin Nagant should be upgraded to match the WWII specs. For example, if Soviet forces are added in PR:WWII, their Mosin would obviously kill in one shot the way the K98 kills in one shot. Heck the M1 Garand was just changed back to killing in one shot. I support changing the Mosin Nagant to 1 shot kills. If you miss the first shot, conventional forces will take cover and are gonna know what weapon you have because the distinctive sound, then know that they can rush you and kill you easily.
|
|
|
2021-03-02, 01:35 | #14 | |
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 476
Trinidad and Tobago
Location: Grenada (Another Island)
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
Quote:
| |
2021-03-02, 08:17 | #15 | |
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 150
Benelux
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
Quote:
The way damage is calculated in PR is that a shot to the armored chest is the baseline. So make that 90 damage, to bring it in line with the sniper rifle. For everything else (i.e. unarmored) there is a multiplier, making it one shot. | |
2021-03-02, 12:36 | #16 |
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 73
Burundi
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
i like this idea cuz taliban can one shot (medic)
they have all the mobility and scopes in usa |
2021-03-02, 13:16 | #17 |
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 150
Benelux
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
|
2021-03-02, 17:50 | #18 |
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 182
United States of America
Location: Texas
|
Re: Why do insurgent medics and riflemen get the worst weapons?
Oh right I totally forgot about the armored variable.
|
|
|
|
|