[Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank - Page 14

MAC$DRE · 2010-01-19, 10:01

looks great rhino! Ive always wanted to see these in the game!!!

Snazz · 2010-01-19, 10:21

Is there a limit to how many different deployable assets we can have apart from filling up the screen with a list of options?

Anglomanii mentioned mortars, which have already been modeled and could be a useful light fire support asset.

I think foxholes already fulfill the role of sandbags, but hesco sangars would be better. Also Hesco barriers with razor wire on top should replace the current tank traps. Then they'd look more like forward operating bases.

motherdear · 2010-01-19, 10:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snazz

I think foxholes already fulfill the role of sandbags, but hesco sangars would be better. Also Hesco barriers with razor wire on top should replace the current tank traps. Then they'd look more like forward operating bases.

hesco barriers need a long time presence in an area to setup, the FB is a firebase and therefore a meeting point for the team.

it is not a build up compound like a FOB. hesco barriers would be unrealistic in regards to the FB setup that we use (these things are heavy as F&#¤)

Snazz · 2010-01-19, 10:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]motherdear

hesco barriers need a long time presence in an area to setup, the FB is a firebase and therefore a meeting point for the team.

it is not a build up compound like a FOB. hesco barriers would be unrealistic in regards to the FB setup that we use (these things are heavy as F&#¤)

Fair enough.

A Sandbox-mod-style, 'build a fort' CnC mode with hesco barriers and sangars would be pretty awesome though.

JM/Maukka · 2010-01-19, 11:52

I hope they add that you can't make that beyond 50m from fob, otherwise this will be too powerful tool.

ViktorMk · 2010-01-19, 11:53

So, i guess 2 hats, and 6 lats aren't enough to handle armour? This really is going to unbalance the game, armour already has so much to worry about. Take Kashan for example, Infantry can Laze them and a Jet will fly over and shoot a missile at it. They can request armour support, or shoot it with one of their own hats.

x-spades-x · 2010-01-19, 13:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViktorMk

So, i guess 2 hats, and 6 lats aren't enough to handle armour? This really is going to unbalance the game, armour already has so much to worry about. Take Kashan for example, Infantry can Laze them and a Jet will fly over and shoot a missile at it. They can request armour support, or shoot it with one of their own hats.

HATs and LATs need to be on the font lines with the Infantry. Not sitting at a FB just waiting around... thats why they are MOBILE at compared to stationary.

Igloo35 · 2010-01-19, 14:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by JM/Maukka

I hope they add that you can't make that beyond 50m from fob, otherwise this will be too powerful tool.

if you can see a tank from a fob at inside 50m you sir are already dead or the armor is umanned

this is a good thing , it's about time

Bluedrake42 · 2010-01-20, 06:39

Finally!!! this will help so much

PLODDITHANLEY · 2010-01-20, 08:34

Maybe armour crews would benefit with a sniper to shoot the TOW users!

2010-01-19, 10:01	#131
MAC$DRE Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 60 United States of America Location: Portland, Oregon	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank looks great rhino! Ive always wanted to see these in the game!!!

2010-01-19, 10:21	#132
Snazz Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,458 Australia	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank Is there a limit to how many different deployable assets we can have apart from filling up the screen with a list of options? Anglomanii mentioned mortars, which have already been modeled and could be a useful light fire support asset. I think foxholes already fulfill the role of sandbags, but hesco sangars would be better. Also Hesco barriers with razor wire on top should replace the current tank traps. Then they'd look more like forward operating bases.
Snazz Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,458 Australia

2010-01-19, 11:52	#135
JM/Maukka Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 3 Finland Location: tampere	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank I hope they add that you can't make that beyond 50m from fob, otherwise this will be too powerful tool.

2010-01-19, 11:53	#136
ViktorMk Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 68 United States of America	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank So, i guess 2 hats, and 6 lats aren't enough to handle armour? This really is going to unbalance the game, armour already has so much to worry about. Take Kashan for example, Infantry can Laze them and a Jet will fly over and shoot a missile at it. They can request armour support, or shoot it with one of their own hats.

2010-01-20, 06:39	#139
Bluedrake42 Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,904 United States of America Location: Louisville KY	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank Finally!!! this will help so much

2010-01-20, 08:34	#140
PLODDITHANLEY Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3,566 New Caledonia	Re: [Weapon] Deployable Anti-Tank Maybe armour crews would benefit with a sniper to shoot the TOW users!