PR:WWII - Community Tasks - Page 2

Arc_Shielder · 2014-12-08, 16:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatalsushi83

Does that mean the player will be able to chose between the bipod or tripod version, or are you getting rid of the tripod version altogether?

After much thought, it will most likely be the latter.

[R-DEV]camo · 2014-12-08, 17:59

So all the effort into making the emplacement version was a bit of a waste? (granted that's only if someone actually does make the m1919a6 model)

Nightingale · 2014-12-08, 18:37

Aw man, I was really looking forward to the tripod version.

Arc_Shielder · 2014-12-08, 21:14

The "emplacement" already existed in PN mounted in the LCVPs. AD had the idea to fill the lack of a handheld Browning by making it deployable through coding. At first we were glad with this but not being able to spawn in enterables and the unbalance caused when against mobile mg 34s/mg42s made us doubt the success of this system. Hence why we will be looking for a more standard approach.

fatalsushi83 · 2014-12-09, 03:43

Also, the fact that the US is usually on the attack and that there are lots of hedgerows limiting your view would put the tripod at even more of a disadvantage. Bipod sounds like a good decision to me.

Nightingale · 2014-12-09, 06:59

Ah, that's too bad then. No point in having a MG that doesn't work in trenches and can't be deployed inside a building.

Anyway, can't wait to see what you guys make!

[R-DEV]camo · 2014-12-09, 07:08

Maybe if it was a pickup kit at each flag that would be cool. Just so all the effort doesn't go to waste.

fatalsushi83 · 2014-12-10, 08:54

maybe it coul be the alt MG kit and have the advantage of larger ammo capacity. just an idea.

Arc_Shielder · 2015-01-15, 15:31

Bump. OP updated.

Browning M1919A6 and M1903A4 Springfield are taken.

cribbaaa · 2015-01-16, 08:55

I like going in to this thread every now and then just to see how the amount of tasks in the OP are becoming fewer and fewer

2014-12-08, 17:59	#12
[R-DEV]camo PR:BF2 Developer Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 3,087 Australia	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks So all the effort into making the emplacement version was a bit of a waste? (granted that's only if someone actually does make the m1919a6 model)

2014-12-08, 18:37	#13
Nightingale Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 340 Canada	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks Aw man, I was really looking forward to the tripod version.
Nightingale Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 340 Canada

2014-12-08, 21:14	#14
Arc_Shielder Retired PR Developer Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,604 Portugal Location: Porto	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks The "emplacement" already existed in PN mounted in the LCVPs. AD had the idea to fill the lack of a handheld Browning by making it deployable through coding. At first we were glad with this but not being able to spawn in enterables and the unbalance caused when against mobile mg 34s/mg42s made us doubt the success of this system. Hence why we will be looking for a more standard approach.

	Last edited by [R-COM]Arc_Shielder; 2014-12-08 at 21:19..

2014-12-09, 03:43	#15
fatalsushi83 Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 540 Japan Location: Nagano	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks Also, the fact that the US is usually on the attack and that there are lots of hedgerows limiting your view would put the tripod at even more of a disadvantage. Bipod sounds like a good decision to me.

2014-12-09, 06:59	#16
Nightingale Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 340 Canada	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks Ah, that's too bad then. No point in having a MG that doesn't work in trenches and can't be deployed inside a building. Anyway, can't wait to see what you guys make!
Nightingale Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 340 Canada

2014-12-09, 07:08	#17
[R-DEV]camo PR:BF2 Developer Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 3,087 Australia	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks Maybe if it was a pickup kit at each flag that would be cool. Just so all the effort doesn't go to waste.

2014-12-10, 08:54	#18
fatalsushi83 Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 540 Japan Location: Nagano	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks maybe it coul be the alt MG kit and have the advantage of larger ammo capacity. just an idea.

2015-01-15, 15:31	#19
Arc_Shielder Retired PR Developer Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,604 Portugal Location: Porto	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks Bump. OP updated. Browning M1919A6 and M1903A4 Springfield are taken.

	Last edited by [R-COM]Arc_Shielder; 2015-01-16 at 15:20..

2015-01-16, 08:55	#20
cribbaaa Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 105 Sweden	Re: PR:WWII - Community Tasks I like going in to this thread every now and then just to see how the amount of tasks in the OP are becoming fewer and fewer
cribbaaa Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 105 Sweden