2009-02-15, 00:22 | #11 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Europe
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
In this release, I actually prefer M's 3 rounds burst over standard full auto assault rifles so I always drop my gun for M16/M4. They also have less recoil than any other rifle while accuracy is identical for all of them. The end. | |
2009-02-15, 00:28 | #12 |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,020
United States of America
Location: Asad Khal
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
On the topic, why does it seem like the M-16/M-4 with ACOG always seem to fire slightly to the left?
|
2009-02-15, 00:30 | #13 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Europe
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
btw. I don't think that M16 should be noticeably more accurate than G3, but it should definetely be more accurate than the AK-47. And for some reason probably only known by God, it isn't.
|
2009-02-15, 04:39 | #14 | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,929
United States of America
Location: US
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
M16 is actually pretty good in CQB, but that is only at real close CQB as the spread gets too much after that. But the accuracy of the QBZ on full auto stays dead accurate even after you fire 20 shots. | |
2009-02-15, 11:56 | #15 | |||
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Europe
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
QBZ Quote:
M16 Quote:
| |||
2009-02-15, 14:13 | #16 | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,929
United States of America
Location: US
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
LOL, you can go by that all you want, but ingame, it is a completely different story. The full auto of the QBZ is faster and stays more accurate after sustained fire. Ask anyone who plays this game. And ask them which one they think is more accurate out of the G3 and M16 and they will say G3 is more accurate, even though you claim they have the same deviation. | |
2009-02-15, 16:50 | #17 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 707
United States of America
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
this is very very accurate at long range as the optic is not bigger then the targets head at long range. The M16/M4 optic is a big & thick ^ and is bigger then the target at long range there for lining up a target at long range is much harder. Simple fix make the M16/M4 ^ smaller much smaller then it will be much more accurate. the " ^ " stand for the triangle in the scope's the QBZ is a small + that blocks view but you can see where it is on the target better this helps in full Auto as the thin lines in the + gives you a very good field of view on what your aiming at. out of theses guns scopes the best for head sniping is. G3 QBZ M16/M4 as they use the same scope. it should be M16 G3 QBZ M4 this is a good idea of how small it should be. photo from arma. | |
Twisted Helix: Yep you were the one tester that was of ultimate value.
|
||
Last edited by R.J.Travis; 2009-02-15 at 17:06..
|
2009-02-16, 10:01 | #18 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Europe
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
Quote:
800 meters? What exactly does that mean? EDIT: I mean, which object is 800 meters away? | |
Last edited by Jonathan_Archer_nx01; 2009-02-16 at 10:45..
|
2009-02-16, 10:13 | #19 |
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 116
United States of America
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
A general improvement in all the guns would be changing the rear sight back to the 2d-fuzziness of regular bf2.. the current defined 3-D stuff is unrealistic and takes away some of your FOV.
|
2009-02-16, 10:44 | #20 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Europe
|
Re: M-16 Accuracy
|
Tags |
accuracy, m16 |
|
|