Fastroping - Page 3

waffenbaum · 2005-07-21, 15:22

Quote:

fast raping is used for quick insertions

I agree.

solodude23 · 2005-07-21, 15:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by waffenbaum

Quote:

fast raping is used for quick insertions

I agree.

...........

keyser Soeze.KIA. · 2005-07-21, 17:35

Quote:

fast raping is used for quick insertions

I agree.

lol i read fast rapeing is used for quick insertions

eddie · 2005-07-21, 21:32

heres a link o fast rOping (not raping/groping)
http://www.drallim.com/docs/CargoDoc...g%20system.pdf
(it needs adobe to view it)

Super Six Three · 2005-07-21, 22:31

picture this with fast roping. imagine playing bf2,your black hawk is trying to land but its too narrow to land,wat would you do?A.deploy the ropes or B.be the jerk and jump out of the BH for no reson?

Medicoris · 2005-07-21, 22:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Advantage

What are you talking about, fast roping is used for quick insertions, and it can be done in seconds, havent you ever seen video of SEALs, etc. doing fastroping, they can have a team of 6 or so on the ground in seconds, plus with PR making helicopter physics more realistic, if you land, it's gonna take awhile to regain enough downward force to lift off, leaving you open to enemy fire.

Ah yes, Tactical is very correct. That is why they call it 'fast roping' after all. Fast roping is nearly a free fall experience, until the very end where you slow your descent before hitting ground. The goal is to get down the rope as fast as you can. Thus making insertion as quick as possible without exsposing the operators or helicopter crew to enemy fire.

Tonedef · 2005-07-22, 15:27

I think that it should be enabled and used at the players discretion...at least give them a choice and see how it works out...10 to 1 it will be used alot as for the realism and most everyone who will be playing this mod are doing so for that exact reason.

Beckwith · 2005-07-22, 16:29

this topic has gotten sooooooooooooo old, i think it was decided before i even got here that if the devs can do it they will, not to flame anyone whos posting here cause i realise most of you guys are new and all, but i dont quite see what more there is to discuss

waffenbaum · 2005-07-22, 16:38

Maybe they're discussing just to discuss then. That's not a crime, even if nothing productive will ever come from it.

Beckwith · 2005-07-22, 17:08

im not saying its wrong, just that one can only take so much debate on an issue thats already been settled

2005-07-21, 22:31	#25
Super Six Three Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 13	picture this with fast roping. imagine playing bf2,your black hawk is trying to land but its too narrow to land,wat would you do?A.deploy the ropes or B.be the jerk and jump out of the BH for no reson?
Super Six Three Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 13

2005-07-22, 15:27	#27
Tonedef Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 115	I think that it should be enabled and used at the players discretion...at least give them a choice and see how it works out...10 to 1 it will be used alot as for the realism and most everyone who will be playing this mod are doing so for that exact reason.
Tonedef Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 115

2005-07-21, 21:32	#24
eddie The [R-MOD]s' Poodle Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 5,494 United Kingdom Location: In Hell with you.	heres a link o fast rOping (not raping/groping) http://www.drallim.com/docs/CargoDoc...g%20system.pdf (it needs adobe to view it)

2005-07-22, 16:29	#28
Beckwith Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,341 Ireland Location: RI,USA	this topic has gotten sooooooooooooo old, i think it was decided before i even got here that if the devs can do it they will, not to flame anyone whos posting here cause i realise most of you guys are new and all, but i dont quite see what more there is to discuss

2005-07-22, 16:38	#29
waffenbaum Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 478 Location: Denmark	Maybe they're discussing just to discuss then. That's not a crime, even if nothing productive will ever come from it.

2005-07-22, 17:08	#30
Beckwith Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,341 Ireland Location: RI,USA	im not saying its wrong, just that one can only take so much debate on an issue thats already been settled