2011-02-11, 16:39 | #21 | |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,835
Canada
Location: London, Ontario
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
Unless you're a robot, I have a hard time believing that you can shift your body upwards and put the rifle in EXACTLY the same spot it was before, INSTANTLY. Even a small movement of the barrel tip could put your shot off by tens of meters at distance. Yet, in PR we have a system that allows you to do it with absolutely no movement, and no deviation punishment. It's unrealistically accurate. | |
2011-02-12, 19:35 | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 122
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
Raven Shield - Fluid Stance In real life, when engaging targets, you don't pop your body out fast and fire a few rounds, a trained professional takes their time when going out of cover, because your correct, a slight deviation of movement would alter the impact of where the bullet lands. Why should PR reward the guy who is camping, I already know where this guy is camping. I fixated my sights on him, now I deserve to take him out. All my enemy has done is sat in the same position believing he is invulnerable to getting shot. His ignorance should not beat my multiple efforts. | |
2011-02-12, 19:53 | #23 | |
PR:BF2 Developer
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
| |
|
||
2011-02-12, 20:51 | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 122
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
The BF2 engine is limited, this is the reason why bipods in PR are the way they are. In real life I could use any cover as a field expedient bipod to deploy my rifle by a simple resting of my barrel on it. Honestly because this is a video game, there are limitations on how you can conduct combat. However in real life, if you know where your enemy is, you still have a chance to take out the enemy if you conduct your own firing stance in a professional level. | |
2011-02-12, 22:43 | #26 | |
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 189
New Zealand
Location: New Zealand
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
| |
2011-02-12, 23:14 | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 122
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
How so? Your not very informative in making your statements. My argument is that the standing/crouching zero deviation is the only method we have on taking out campers who think they should never die due to their ignorance of tactics.
|
2011-02-12, 23:19 | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 122
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
This is a real method of deploying yourself in the same manner as using a bipod. Many operatives from Delta Force use this method. The logic is that the soldier who takes cover over the soldier who lays in the open with no cover will always lose. It doesn't matter if you go prone and fixate on a enemy. Those who use cover professional will always have that advantage of hiding from enemy fire. | |
2011-02-12, 23:34 | #29 |
PR:BF2 Developer
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
It is inherently unrealistic and borderline exploitative imo. You're statement just makes very little sense. Leaving in what is pretty much a loophole in the deviation mechanic for the sake of 'being able to kill campers' is just silly. Should PR reverse the 1.5 changes to proning deviation because 'it takes out campers'?
|
|
|
2011-02-12, 23:40 | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 122
|
Re: Crouch to standing shot accuracy
Quote:
| |
Tags |
accuracy, crouch, shot, standing |
|
|