[Static Model] Nimitz class carrier - Page 4

Maxfragg · 2007-07-22, 07:07

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)

great work btw and so or so a Kuznetsov would really also be awsome

ice_killer · 2007-07-22, 09:05

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007

Griffon2-6 · 2007-07-22, 12:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cerberus

Coral Sea was such a great map...

Coral Sea?

Rhino · 2007-07-22, 12:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-MOD]Griffon2-6

Coral Sea?

bf1942 map, carrier vs carrier air battle map.

Clypp · 2007-07-22, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxfragg

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)

You mean because in the PR setup the Russians and the US is the same team (Team 1) whereas the Chinese, MEC, etc are on the other team?

Or do you mean scenario wise? Who knows what can happen in the future and it does not matter in terms of gameplay. Just the other week Putin send a fleet of bombers toward UK airspace as a threat to NATO's policies.

Maxfragg · 2007-07-23, 11:11

i meant team wise

LtSoucy · 2007-07-23, 11:13

Quote:

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007

2 years ago in US a person got sued over saying that. Bt on the map ill say yes!

LtSoucy · 2007-07-23, 11:15

annd also why cant we use the carrier from SF? its the same thing he is going to build!

Crusader09 · 2007-07-24, 04:50

Quote:

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China

Good luck trying that one. China only has one Russian made carrier in their navy and it is in pretty bad shape. Probably doesn't even have an engine. Would be a very bad battle for China in that map. Might sink as soon as the game starts.

Maxfragg · 2007-07-24, 07:44

the "thing from SF" is the same landing craft that is already in Battlefield 2 just with rooms inside and it isn't even half of the sice of a nimitz class aircraft carrier, those landingcrafts can only launch vertical take of jets like the harrier and helicopters, in real live a F/A-18 can not start from this baby carrier

2007-07-23, 11:15	#38
LtSoucy Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 3,076 Lithuania Location: Lowell MA USA	annd also why cant we use the carrier from SF? its the same thing he is going to build!
	Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality http://realitygamer.org/

2007-07-22, 07:07	#31
Maxfragg Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,077 Germany Location: Frankonia, Germany	would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians) great work btw and so or so a Kuznetsov would really also be awsome

2007-07-22, 09:05	#32
ice_killer Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,356 Netherlands Location: Netherlands	yea some thiung like this name atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007

2007-07-23, 11:11	#36
Maxfragg Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,077 Germany Location: Frankonia, Germany	i meant team wise

2007-07-24, 07:44	#40
Maxfragg Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,077 Germany Location: Frankonia, Germany	the "thing from SF" is the same landing craft that is already in Battlefield 2 just with rooms inside and it isn't even half of the sice of a nimitz class aircraft carrier, those landingcrafts can only launch vertical take of jets like the harrier and helicopters, in real live a F/A-18 can not start from this baby carrier