Never any jets or attack helos vs. taliban/insurgents - Page 4

nvram · 2011-12-14, 21:23

And soon they are armed like a regular force.....

niho · 2011-12-14, 22:23

I would agree with an Apache on Korengal, since IMHO the Taliban is to overpowered on this map.
They would still have enough opportunity to hide, but should get some ZPU2s.
One problem could be the size of the map and another what nvram just said.

Stealthgato · 2011-12-14, 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by niho

I would agree with an Apache on Korengal, since IMHO the Taliban is to overpowered on this map.
They would still have enough opportunity to hide, but should get some ZPU2s.
One problem could be the size of the map and another what nvram just said.

An Apache on Korengal would never even manage to leave the helipad.

sharpie · 2011-12-14, 22:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by saXoni

For who?

Whom*

<3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 3333333333333333333

40mmrain · 2011-12-14, 23:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stealthgato

An Apache on Korengal would never even manage to leave the helipad.

This why i say in the OP a small fire base thats justa helipad and hescos in a secluded corner of the map, unable to be attacked by opfor would be ideal, not the present base.

Perhaps a lot of work, and a tad unrealistic, but so is americans with no air support in korengal

Tyso3 · 2011-12-15, 06:05

How about in keeping with the mosin nagant etc, Some 2cm Flak cannons lol

Dev1200 · 2011-12-15, 08:32

It's because people cry OP when they get owned and not know how to use AA.

saXoni · 2011-12-15, 16:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharpie

Whom*

I'm still struggling to learn the difference between "who" and "whom". Give me a couple of months, and I've got it.

Stealthgato · 2011-12-15, 16:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by 40mmrain

This why i say in the OP a small fire base thats justa helipad and hescos in a secluded corner of the map, unable to be attacked by opfor would be ideal, not the present base.

Perhaps a lot of work, and a tad unrealistic, but so is americans with no air support in korengal

Apache would still get raped. Even if it managed to take off, in such a small map it doesn't stand a chance.

~~LieutenantNessie~~ · 2011-12-15, 17:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by saXoni

I'm still struggling to learn the difference between "who" and "whom". Give me a couple of months, and I've got it.

You better

2011-12-14, 21:23	#31
nvram Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 38 Germany	Re: Never any jets or attack helos vs. taliban/insurgents And soon they are armed like a regular force.....
nvram Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 38 Germany

2011-12-14, 22:23	#32
niho Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 39 Germany	Re: Never any jets or attack helos vs. taliban/insurgents I would agree with an Apache on Korengal, since IMHO the Taliban is to overpowered on this map. They would still have enough opportunity to hide, but should get some ZPU2s. One problem could be the size of the map and another what nvram just said.
niho Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 39 Germany

2011-12-15, 06:05	#36
Tyso3 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 41	Re: Never any jets or attack helos vs. taliban/insurgents How about in keeping with the mosin nagant etc, Some 2cm Flak cannons lol
Tyso3 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 41

2011-12-15, 08:32	#37
Dev1200 Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1,668 Canada Location: Alberta	Re: Never any jets or attack helos vs. taliban/insurgents It's because people cry OP when they get owned and not know how to use AA.