|
PR:BF2 Feedback Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer). |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2013-09-14, 06:51 | #31 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,756
United States of America
Location: North Carolina
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Exhibit A....
|
|
|
2013-09-14, 08:20 | #32 |
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,152
Croatia
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Oh common. Did you see the way IDF played in that video? Its like a bunch of CoD kiddies playing the mod for the first time employing such brilliant tactics such as a lone dude crossing a road diagonally directly towards a building full of hostiles...
|
2013-09-14, 08:33 | #33 | |
Retired PR Developer
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Quote:
The original impetus for removing IDF scopes was due to MA feedback on what their forces are currently issued; at the same time, a lot of IDF scenarios in PR deal with hypothetical conflicts with conventional armies, which does not reflect their current deployments and missions (which are primarily urban environments with a fair amount of armored support and CQB). It will be discussed. | |
|
||
2013-09-14, 08:42 | #34 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 476
Europe
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
I am for option where MEC and Russia would have less scopes (probably equivalent to IDF)
on maps where they are fighting IDF. Almost every MEC kit poses damn marksman rifle. |
2013-09-14, 09:00 | #35 | |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,585
United States of America
Location: Lake Forest, California
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Quote:
I was leading a IDF squad. Trust me, the team was trying. Its hard to stay together though when you cant move. To be able to move to get close to the enemy you need to keep their heads down, which is hard to do if you cant get accurate fire on them. That round we brought up our open top M113s to try to suppress as we moved but they usually got shot out. And the tank was always down because the HAVOK. I played that map again as Russia and it was a cake walk. Didnt even see the tank live long enough to engage us. | |
2013-09-14, 11:09 | #36 | |||
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 337
Korea (North)
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
2013-09-14, 11:31 | #37 |
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,280
Yugoslavia
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Complete inability on the IDF side, clearly seen by lone wolves and general depring in the contruction site.
I swear if i hear the "No scope = No accurate fire" argument once more im gonna flip. HOW IS THAT. HOW IN THE NAME OF YOUR OWN MOTHER IS THAT SO? Deviation is the same. Mouse button1=fire is the same. Its not about accurate fire also, IDF have much greater volume of fire on all weapons, how is that for suppresion? Ah ofcourse, if your squad and you cant use that tactics, its easier to come whine on the forums how unbalanced it is. L2P is all i have to say. |
Last edited by Heavy Death; 2013-09-14 at 11:38..
|
2013-09-14, 13:48 | #38 |
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 235
United States of America
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Target acquisition, yo. You cant shoot at what you cant see.
|
2013-09-14, 15:07 | #39 | |
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 272
Argentina
Location: Buenos Aires
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Quote:
with the binocs you can spot them very easily lack of scopes is not the problem, the map is not balanced in my opinion and that dyslexi's video just show how a bunch of noobs on the other team tried to get to the flag running through the open, (not talking about your squad conman as I know you are a good SL) | |
2013-09-14, 17:34 | #40 | |
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 121
United States of America
Location: you can't locate a Nomad...
|
Re: IDF have too few scopes!
Quote:
My bottom line here is don't compare both as they don't have the same conditions... | |
Tags |
idf, scopes |
|
|