[Vehicles] Tanks - Page 4

ralfidude · 2009-03-02, 00:06

Is it me or is nighthawk mouthing off to you guys a bit?

Night, it has been clearly explained to you. Im saying this very calmly, without any harmful intent now, that if you do not understand the reasoning after it has been explained to you 3 times now at least in this single post, then maybe its best to leave it alone for now.

The devs are highly capable superhumans who give us all joy, and we seem to trust them with out lives (I wouldnt let any of them drive my dodge challenger though, but i have reasons for that, lol. ), as we trust them with making decisions such as merging the commanders position with the drivers, which in turn merges the view to an upper 360 type view you are accustomed to now.

GreGorY.c.k · 2009-03-31, 06:11

tanks are fine...enough said

nick20404 · 2009-03-31, 06:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by ralfidude

Is it me or is nighthawk mouthing off to you guys a bit?

Night, it has been clearly explained to you. Im saying this very calmly, without any harmful intent now, that if you do not understand the reasoning after it has been explained to you 3 times now at least in this single post, then maybe its best to leave it alone for now.

The devs are highly capable superhumans who give us all joy, and we seem to trust them with out lives (I wouldnt let any of them drive my dodge challenger though, but i have reasons for that, lol. ), as we trust them with making decisions such as merging the commanders position with the drivers, which in turn merges the view to an upper 360 type view you are accustomed to now.

I think he just doesn't want anyone to reply he just wants the devs to change it no matter what anyone else thinks.

Feriluce · 2009-03-31, 07:19

Driving a tank is boring enough already, I dont wanna have to look out of a tiny hatch too.
Realism is good and all, but no matter what, this is still a game, and a game has to be fun or ppl wouldnt be playing it.
If the only thing you want is realism I suggest you go join your country's army. Then you can drive a real tank, and look out a real tiny hatch if you so desire.

~~JohnTheRipper~~ · 2009-03-31, 19:06

What i want changed on the tanks are the 7.62mm guns because it sucks not having the machine gun tuned to fire in the crosshair or very close instead it's way off to the side.

Remoted-Bomb · 2009-04-04, 13:45

Well, I'm for the threads creator and the idea of commander. It would be fun to be that one.. :-/ The driver, well, no matter what, he is driving and without good driver, you're dead. But it would be the same with gunner and commander.

Anyway, I'm aware of the 32 player limit.. but you somehow will be able to increase, i think this would be implemented immediately, becouse i don't agree at all about that it would be boring.

Websterish · 2009-04-04, 17:07

I don't think it's needed, the driver has a commander type view and 4 people for a full tank would be a little too much.

Remoted-Bomb · 2009-04-05, 06:37

4 people? A loader would be quite boring. But commander, driver, gunner. Perfect.

masterceo · 2009-04-05, 10:29

being a driver isnt already much fun, if i have a need for speed i play GRID instead of PR. making a new "commander" position for a tank is just pointless and would be very boring.

Cheditor · 2009-04-05, 12:00

The view for the driver is ace i think just a bit annoying when the gun looks backwards, hmm where did i put my vision.

2009-03-02, 00:06	#31
ralfidude Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 2,349 Location: NYC	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks Is it me or is nighthawk mouthing off to you guys a bit? Night, it has been clearly explained to you. Im saying this very calmly, without any harmful intent now, that if you do not understand the reasoning after it has been explained to you 3 times now at least in this single post, then maybe its best to leave it alone for now. The devs are highly capable superhumans who give us all joy, and we seem to trust them with out lives (I wouldnt let any of them drive my dodge challenger though, but i have reasons for that, lol. ), as we trust them with making decisions such as merging the commanders position with the drivers, which in turn merges the view to an upper 360 type view you are accustomed to now.
ralfidude Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 2,349 Location: NYC

2009-03-31, 06:11	#32
GreGorY.c.k Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 9 United Kingdom Location: Edinburgh	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks tanks are fine...enough said

2009-03-31, 07:19	#34
Feriluce Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 332 Denmark	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks Driving a tank is boring enough already, I dont wanna have to look out of a tiny hatch too. Realism is good and all, but no matter what, this is still a game, and a game has to be fun or ppl wouldnt be playing it. If the only thing you want is realism I suggest you go join your country's army. Then you can drive a real tank, and look out a real tiny hatch if you so desire.
Feriluce Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 332 Denmark

2009-03-31, 19:06	#35
~~JohnTheRipper~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 233 United States of America	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks What i want changed on the tanks are the 7.62mm guns because it sucks not having the machine gun tuned to fire in the crosshair or very close instead it's way off to the side.

2009-04-04, 13:45	#36
Remoted-Bomb Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 47 Sweden Location: Sweden	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks Well, I'm for the threads creator and the idea of commander. It would be fun to be that one.. :-/ The driver, well, no matter what, he is driving and without good driver, you're dead. But it would be the same with gunner and commander. Anyway, I'm aware of the 32 player limit.. but you somehow will be able to increase, i think this would be implemented immediately, becouse i don't agree at all about that it would be boring.

2009-04-04, 17:07	#37
Websterish Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2 Canada Location: Kingston	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks I don't think it's needed, the driver has a commander type view and 4 people for a full tank would be a little too much.

2009-04-05, 06:37	#38
Remoted-Bomb Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 47 Sweden Location: Sweden	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks 4 people? A loader would be quite boring. But commander, driver, gunner. Perfect.

2009-04-05, 10:29	#39
masterceo Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,913 United Kingdom Location: London	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks being a driver isnt already much fun, if i have a need for speed i play GRID instead of PR. making a new "commander" position for a tank is just pointless and would be very boring.

2009-04-05, 12:00	#40
Cheditor Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,330 United Kingdom Location: london	Re: [Vehicles] Tanks The view for the driver is ace i think just a bit annoying when the gun looks backwards, hmm where did i put my vision.