project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > News / Announcements > Project Reality News
19 Sep 2024, 00:00:00 (PRT)
Register Developer Blogs Members List Search Quick Links
Project Reality News Project Reality news releases and announcements.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2019-03-13, 15:45   #41
[R-DEV]Suchar
PR:BF2 QA Lead
PR Server License Administrator

Suchar's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Not the 'free aim' thingy for GL sights

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/uploads/signatures/sigpic98978_4.gif
Suchar is offline
Old 2019-03-13, 15:50   #42
PBAsydney
Supporting Member

PBAsydney's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Are networked tank shells ever going to be a thing? Alon mentioned it a while ago and I've been excited for it ever since.




HITREG CARRY
PBAsydney is offline
Old 2019-03-13, 16:21   #43
[R-DEV]​ALADE3N
PR:BF2 Developer

ALADE3N's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by PBAsydney View Post
Are networked tank shells ever going to be a thing? Alon mentioned it a while ago and I've been excited for it ever since.
would be nice

ALADE3N is offline
Old 2019-03-13, 17:49   #44
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rhino's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

All of those things are actually possible with the BF2 engine, just totally impractical in reality.

The destroyable objects in the first video is possible in BF2, but BF2142 is also limited in how many dest objects it can have just like BF2. The only actual advantage 2142 has over BF2 is you can have destroyable children which means you don't need to place destroyable objects separately from their parent and that has uses more in other areas than statics.

The dynamic sky is totally impractical since it relies totally on dynamic shadows and those in BF2/2142 are rubbish and why you only see them when you're close up to objects.

Sniper bullet drop is again possible in BF2, just the problem is tracer and non-tracer rounds have different drag rates. We could however just do this for sniper rifles but then other rifles would suck. There is also a BF2 Sniper mod that takes full advantage of this bullet drop (I think even before Mosquill did that video): https://www.moddb.com/mods/wookiesnipermod

Working HUD and instruments exceeded the max amount of moving objects on a vehicle when we tried it with the Zhi-9 series and was just totally impractical to implement in any serious way. Dunno about the TrackIR part thou but FreeTrack BF2 has been around for some time but no longer possible with PR iirc.

Free aim for UGLs/leaf sights I believe is possible in BF2 but again, impractical over designated ranges.


While there are some advantages the 2142 engine has, there are some disadvantages too but at the end of the day, they are basically the same engine and the amount of work needed to get just a few extra things is not really worth it, especially if we can't overcome the losses of the grappling hook and other things.
But I will say one of the main advantages I would like from the BF2142 engine would be "automated weapons", wherein 2142 you could throw down some automated sentry gun but this code could be used to have automated base defences that could shoot down enemy jets coming in range of your base and would be a far better solution to the "dome of death", at least for aircraft.

Rhino is offline
Old 2019-03-13, 22:59   #45
Scubbo
Supporting Member
PR Server License Administrator

Scubbo's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

was the much longer fog/view distance just because of the more basic map? because if not then that in itself would be better ^_^
Scubbo is offline
Old 2019-03-14, 03:14   #46
[R-DEV]​Arab
PR:BF2 Developer
Supporting Member

Arab's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scubbo View Post
was the much longer fog/view distance just because of the more basic map? because if not then that in itself would be better ^_^
Yep because it doesn't have a lot of objects to draw, the mapper can increase the view distance to the maximum without suffering heavy performance loss.

Arab is offline
Old 2019-03-14, 15:14   #47
mries
Supporting Member
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Bullet drop for sniper only would be an improvement. Even if other guns still act without drop.
Makes sniper class more hard to play and less prone to be able to be abused by noob players denying a place with one person.

Or isn't it possible to only allow drop on sniper rifles only?

mries is offline
Old 2019-03-14, 16:24   #48
[R-DEV]​ALADE3N
PR:BF2 Developer

ALADE3N's Avatar
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by mries View Post
Bullet drop for sniper only would be an improvement. Even if other guns still act without drop.
Makes sniper class more hard to play and less prone to be able to be abused by noob players denying a place with one person.

Or isn't it possible to only allow drop on sniper rifles only?
can be possible

ALADE3N is offline
Old 2019-03-14, 17:37   #49
blayas
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Another point involving the refractor updated in 2142, would not be the mechanics of moving bases, and the stability of objects on them while moving?, In addition to the command system that allowed the commander to move these titans.
blayas is offline
Old 2019-03-15, 16:48   #50
mebel
Supporting Member
Default Re: PR:BF2 v1.6/WW2 Status Update March 2019

Are there gonna by any significant mechanic adjustments featurd in next version? I mean changes like damage, stamina, physics, ballistics, etc.
mebel is offline
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 16:59.