Thinking in tickets - Page 5

Sabre_tooth_tigger · 2008-07-06, 15:37

Im only talking about distributing the present bleed rate across all the flags not increasing it. So Jabal, MEC get bleed on usmc when they cap east beach and there is 6 cappable flags for them total so divide the bleed rate across all 6 so each is valuable to hold and defend

USMC get a bleed on MEC when they cap both cities. If you took both bleeds, average them out and apply it in all flag situations according to how many flags each side holds then defence would be more important then now where its just bleed vs KDR

cyberzomby · 2008-07-06, 16:52

As a first time commander I was busy taking the flags because of the bleed. Only finding out that they dont cause bleed anymore ( not all of them ) Thankfully some nice players explained to me that it was more important to hold certain areas to make sure we wouldnt lose to many tickets for deaths!

When I go play PR this night I will try commanding with the tips learned here! Looks good!

And I know what your saying Sabre. Without the bleed its a bit weird to send off squads to a certain area to just hang in there. For a lot of players: Flags seem the most important thing. I only play on TG server ( when I get in that is :P ) so I play wiht people with the right mindset but than theres still a lot of flag mentality.

vilhelm123 · 2008-07-20, 01:14

Maybe I’m just a bad commander but i rarely think in tickets and spend alot of my time thinking on my feet. Although i do like to keep one squad as a sort of tactical reverse if they will co-operate. They normally take the form of the squad that not got many members or some sort of tank squad. Doing that allows me to break most attacks and also gives me enough boots on the ground to order an advance to capitalize on any repulsed attacks.

WildBill1337 · 2008-08-07, 01:31

i dont think in tickets at all. as commander i give squads general orders, then leave it to the squad leaders to decide which specific actions to take. i also end up relaying information from one squad to the other.

1st example: ill put attack or defend markers for each squad. after they recieve the order, i kleave it to them to decide how they want to go about their objective.

2nd example: sq

WildBill1337 · 2008-08-07, 01:33

i dont think in tickets at all. as commander i give squads general orders, then leave it to the squad leaders to decide which specific actions to take. i also end up relaying information from one squad to the other. im a pretty laid back commander that lets squad leaders do what they see fit unless i see something that they dont.

1st example: ill put attack or defend markers for each squad. after they recieve the order, i kleave it to them to decide how they want to go about their objective.

2nd example: squad 3 is at a firebase and is under attack from the north. squad 7 is to the north. i relay information to squad 7 that they are behind enemies to their south, and end up saving squad 3 with that information.

sorry first one didnt post right.

Psycho_Sam · 2008-09-05, 11:28

Interesting point in 0.8 now seeing as you have no way of telling how many tickets the enemy has. I wonder how commanders will adapt to this change.

Tartantyco · 2008-09-05, 11:38

-I find that teams keep fighting to the end more often. At least half the games I've played have ended with only a few tickets remaining for the winner(1-15 tickets), and this makes teams fight for every ticket all the way to the end. I remember on Barracuda, we had five tickets left and I typed in GG expecting to lose. Then, at 3 tickets the game ended with our side victorious.

HunterMed · 2008-09-05, 12:02

Yep, games are getting closer now ticket wise... Often below the 30 tickets marker.

Sabre_tooth_tigger · 2008-09-05, 12:15

They always were close, I thought it might have the opposite effect but 1-0 ticket scores were common last version on pubs. Unless one team gets a bleed its just about kdr and 1 for 1 kills are the natural average I guess

Psycho_Sam · 2008-09-05, 13:48

Yeah I guess one of the reasons is that teams cannot see the others ticket status so they are less likely to either lay off (if they are miles ahead) or give up if they are miles behind and of course closer battles are alwyas more fun!

View Poll Results: Do you think in tickets when commanding
No	43	27.04%
Yes	73	45.91%
Occasionally	43	27.04%
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

2008-07-06, 15:37	#41
Sabre_tooth_tigger Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,913 Mozambique	Re: Thinking in tickets Im only talking about distributing the present bleed rate across all the flags not increasing it. So Jabal, MEC get bleed on usmc when they cap east beach and there is 6 cappable flags for them total so divide the bleed rate across all 6 so each is valuable to hold and defend USMC get a bleed on MEC when they cap both cities. If you took both bleeds, average them out and apply it in all flag situations according to how many flags each side holds then defence would be more important then now where its just bleed vs KDR

2008-07-06, 16:52	#42
cyberzomby Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,307 Netherlands	Re: Thinking in tickets As a first time commander I was busy taking the flags because of the bleed. Only finding out that they dont cause bleed anymore ( not all of them ) Thankfully some nice players explained to me that it was more important to hold certain areas to make sure we wouldnt lose to many tickets for deaths! When I go play PR this night I will try commanding with the tips learned here! Looks good! And I know what your saying Sabre. Without the bleed its a bit weird to send off squads to a certain area to just hang in there. For a lot of players: Flags seem the most important thing. I only play on TG server ( when I get in that is :P ) so I play wiht people with the right mindset but than theres still a lot of flag mentality.

2008-07-20, 01:14	#43
vilhelm123 Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 415 United Kingdom Location: Surrey	Re: Thinking in tickets Maybe I’m just a bad commander but i rarely think in tickets and spend alot of my time thinking on my feet. Although i do like to keep one squad as a sort of tactical reverse if they will co-operate. They normally take the form of the squad that not got many members or some sort of tank squad. Doing that allows me to break most attacks and also gives me enough boots on the ground to order an advance to capitalize on any repulsed attacks.

2008-08-07, 01:31	#44
WildBill1337 Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 317 Location: Texas	Re: Thinking in tickets i dont think in tickets at all. as commander i give squads general orders, then leave it to the squad leaders to decide which specific actions to take. i also end up relaying information from one squad to the other. 1st example: ill put attack or defend markers for each squad. after they recieve the order, i kleave it to them to decide how they want to go about their objective. 2nd example: sq

2008-08-07, 01:33	#45
WildBill1337 Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 317 Location: Texas	Re: Thinking in tickets i dont think in tickets at all. as commander i give squads general orders, then leave it to the squad leaders to decide which specific actions to take. i also end up relaying information from one squad to the other. im a pretty laid back commander that lets squad leaders do what they see fit unless i see something that they dont. 1st example: ill put attack or defend markers for each squad. after they recieve the order, i kleave it to them to decide how they want to go about their objective. 2nd example: squad 3 is at a firebase and is under attack from the north. squad 7 is to the north. i relay information to squad 7 that they are behind enemies to their south, and end up saving squad 3 with that information. sorry first one didnt post right.

2008-09-05, 11:28	#46
Psycho_Sam Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 255 United Kingdom Location: Birmingham	Re: Thinking in tickets Interesting point in 0.8 now seeing as you have no way of telling how many tickets the enemy has. I wonder how commanders will adapt to this change.

2008-09-05, 11:38	#47
Tartantyco Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,791 Norway Location: Trondheim, Norway	Re: Thinking in tickets -I find that teams keep fighting to the end more often. At least half the games I've played have ended with only a few tickets remaining for the winner(1-15 tickets), and this makes teams fight for every ticket all the way to the end. I remember on Barracuda, we had five tickets left and I typed in GG expecting to lose. Then, at 3 tickets the game ended with our side victorious.

2008-09-05, 12:02	#48
HunterMed Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,069 Europe	Re: Thinking in tickets Yep, games are getting closer now ticket wise... Often below the 30 tickets marker.
HunterMed Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,069 Europe	Check out my PR videos

2008-09-05, 12:15	#49
Sabre_tooth_tigger Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,913 Mozambique	Re: Thinking in tickets They always were close, I thought it might have the opposite effect but 1-0 ticket scores were common last version on pubs. Unless one team gets a bleed its just about kdr and 1 for 1 kills are the natural average I guess

2008-09-05, 13:48	#50
Psycho_Sam Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 255 United Kingdom Location: Birmingham	Re: Thinking in tickets Yeah I guess one of the reasons is that teams cannot see the others ticket status so they are less likely to either lay off (if they are miles ahead) or give up if they are miles behind and of course closer battles are alwyas more fun!