|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2010-11-30, 15:05 | #41 |
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,467
Australia
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
The Tunguska, since its an infantry rape machine, should be 2 manned. Every other AA should require just a single, its unrealistic, but the extra person on the ground/in a tank etc. is more beneficial to the team.
|
2010-11-30, 15:12 | #42 |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,489
Israel
Location: ^ tnx for fixing!
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
^ Agree
Gunning+Driving AA is wtf boring enough, but only driving one is just /wrists... |
|
|
2010-11-30, 15:25 | #43 |
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
I'd like to point out that the tunguska may be a rape machine, but it sounds like one, and deploys like a tank.
The Avenger Humvee on the other hand, sounds like a normal light vehicle until it rolls up and dumps 200 rounds of .50 into you and your squad, with a few wildly aimed missiles to boot. And then flees the scene before anyone can show up to deal with it. |
2010-11-30, 19:51 | #44 |
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,896
United Kingdom
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
So its not ok if it rapes infantry but it is if it rapes aircraft?
|
2010-11-30, 20:24 | #45 | |
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 104
United States of America
Location: Missouri
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
Quote:
| |
2010-11-30, 22:14 | #46 | |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 830
United Kingdom
Location: Sea of Tranquillity
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
Quote:
I Will say it again as it looks like the point has been lost. Base raping issues aside (remember that some server don't have that rule). The amount of teamwork needed to use the Anti aircraft vehicle is zero. Yet it has the power to kill a tank. This is wrong. Just today I saw an US Army Anti aircraft vehicle Avenger kill a tank (it may have been damaged before the the Anti aircraft vehicle hit it, But I did not see that). This is a lot of fire power at the hands of just one player. It's armored. Making it require a LAT or more to kill it (yes I know you can fozz/C4/mine it if you can get close). For such a thing to have this much power and need zero teamwork to use/kill is just plan wrong. Everything else in PR needs teamwork to be used. Why should the Anti aircraft vehicle be any different? Some of you say it would take away players from other jobs/roles on the battle field. Fine. Make it have 1 single seat. And reduce it's ammo count to just 2 rockets. Then it can still fill the role of an Anti aircraft vehicle. But it can't go around killing tanks and troops to it's hearts content. | |
2010-12-01, 05:08 | #47 |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,489
Israel
Location: ^ tnx for fixing!
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
How can an AAV kill a tank? spam missiles and hope they hit somewhere around it or wut? Tank crew must be wtfubernub..
|
|
|
2010-12-01, 07:12 | #48 | |
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 104
United States of America
Location: Missouri
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
Quote:
Also this reminds me of an old quote on here that "Players are hard coded". No matter what you do or how you do it, jackasses will be jackasses and find a way to screw it up. | |
Last edited by Grizzly; 2010-12-01 at 07:16..
Reason: Afterthought
|
2010-12-01, 18:39 | #49 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 830
United Kingdom
Location: Sea of Tranquillity
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
|
2010-12-23, 20:38 | #50 | |
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 918
United States of America
Location: Oceanside
|
Re: Anti aircraft vehicle, Why can they still be used as a solo driven/fired vehicle
Quote:
| |
Tags |
aircraft, anti, driven or fired, solo, vehicle |
|
|