Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? - Page 9

bosco_ · 2008-05-10, 13:09

Airsoft ain't quite like Real life, and I trust the judgement of people who have served more, no offense.

blud · 2008-05-10, 19:08

Even people who have served say that you can run and gun pretty well (or at least walk and gun).

Anyways earlier in the thread people were saying there is no game with good CQB, but in my opinion True Combat Elite has it.

Drake · 2008-05-10, 19:38

No, just no.

As long as PR is on BF2 engine, we have to deal with prone spam. There is no way around it, without ruining the fun.

PrivateJson · 2008-05-10, 20:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-PUB]bosco

Airsoft ain't quite like Real life, and I trust the judgement of people who have served more, no offense.

Airsoft can be pretty real. You spray a lot more, but it's mostly like CQB, up close! You don't have the range of real guns, so you have to get close to "kill" the enemy!

I've served, Danish Army - Recon, and you do learn how to fire while moving, not just in CQB training. But like in Airsoft, you have to get up close to hit anything when moving and shooting at the same time, unless you're just laying down suppressive fire!

regards,
Steen

cplgangster · 2008-05-10, 20:25

in the british army dont they train the soldiers to dash down crawl observe sight fire. this means you would drop straight to belt buckles as you are less of a target then move to cover that is around you. so this is very realistic.

Wolfe · 2008-05-10, 22:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drake

No, just no. As long as PR is on BF2 engine, we have to deal with prone spam. There is no way around it, without ruining the fun.

Actually, I've reduced run'n gun/prone spam by 90% without sacrificing accuracy... so no, we don't have to deal with it. There is a way around it.

"Now that I've seen this, I don't want to go back to .75" - tester quote

Jaymz · 2008-05-10, 23:49

lockage,

I think Warren said it best and just for your information, the suppression effect is officially gone from CQB come 0.8.

Hopefully we'll incorporate Wolfe's changes or at least some form of it as long as it doesn't affect anything negatively.

2008-05-10, 13:09	#81
bosco_ Retired PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 14,594 Germany Blog Entries: 5	Re: Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? Airsoft ain't quite like Real life, and I trust the judgement of people who have served more, no offense.

2008-05-10, 19:08	#82
blud Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,246 Afghanistan	Re: Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? Even people who have served say that you can run and gun pretty well (or at least walk and gun). Anyways earlier in the thread people were saying there is no game with good CQB, but in my opinion True Combat Elite has it.
blud Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,246 Afghanistan

2008-05-10, 19:38	#83
Drake Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 119	Re: Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? No, just no. As long as PR is on BF2 engine, we have to deal with prone spam. There is no way around it, without ruining the fun.
Drake Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 119

2008-05-10, 20:25	#85
cplgangster Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,150 United Kingdom Location: london	Re: Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? in the british army dont they train the soldiers to dash down crawl observe sight fire. this means you would drop straight to belt buckles as you are less of a target then move to cover that is around you. so this is very realistic.

2008-05-10, 23:49	#87
Jaymz Retired PR Developer Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 9,127 Ireland Blog Entries: 5	Re: Would you sacrifice move/shoot to 100% eliminate prone spam? lockage, I think Warren said it best and just for your information, the suppression effect is officially gone from CQB come 0.8. Hopefully we'll incorporate Wolfe's changes or at least some form of it as long as it doesn't affect anything negatively.
	"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake