Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor.

PLA · 2014-02-22, 00:26

Will PR2 sacrifice realism for balance?

Will the bullet damage from different guns be realistic or will the guns be "balanced" to cater to the more casual crowd? For example a machine gun doing less damage than a sniper rifle firing the same round.

For example in Battlefield 4:

M40A5 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 80 damage

SCAR-H fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 30 damage

M240 B fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 34 damage

MK11 MOD 0 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 50 damage

G3A3 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 34 damage

^Totally unrealistic and breaks the immersion.

Also will body armor play a role? I've seen a guy get hit by an (SVD? 7.62x54mm) round center mass, get knocked down, but was OK because the bullet didn't penetrate his armor.

Limeni[BiH] · 2014-02-22, 00:41

I hope not.

baltimore · 2014-02-22, 13:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Limeni[BiH]

I hope not.

You better go and play BF4. I realy hope the damages will be realistic+ it's known that body armor will have big role.

Brainlaag · 2014-02-22, 13:56

I really hope they'll go for modular damage ala RO2 with fully working body armor.

Psyrus · 2014-02-22, 14:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brainlaag

I really hope they'll go for modular damage ala RO2 with fully working body armor.

What does 'fully working body armor' mean? Like we can get knocked to the ground by a 7.62 round at close-ish distance but it won't injure us long-term?

Brainlaag · 2014-02-23, 10:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-CON]Psyrus

What does 'fully working body armor' mean? Like we can get knocked to the ground by a 7.62 round at close-ish distance but it won't injure us long-term?

Not necessarily a staggering animation but penetrating and non-penetrating hits would be cool.

MikeDude · 2014-02-24, 15:04

As long as it is not based on chance, it would be cool.

Spush · 2014-02-24, 15:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyboyz

As long as it is not based on chance, it would be cool.

Heh, that basically what PR was before the deviation changes in 1.0.

baltimore · 2014-02-24, 18:50

deviation in PR2?

huh?

IWI-GALIL.556FA · 2014-02-25, 00:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by baltimore

deviation in PR2?

huh?

WTF do you think? Why the fu** wouldn't it? You don't have to reply on every fricking post just to see it. Your posts are worthless and you're the reason the ask the devs thread is done. Stop trolling ffs

2014-02-22, 00:26	#1
PLA Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 3 United States of America	Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor. Will PR2 sacrifice realism for balance? Will the bullet damage from different guns be realistic or will the guns be "balanced" to cater to the more casual crowd? For example a machine gun doing less damage than a sniper rifle firing the same round. For example in Battlefield 4: M40A5 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 80 damage SCAR-H fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 30 damage M240 B fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 34 damage MK11 MOD 0 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 50 damage G3A3 fires the 7.62x51 NATO - 34 damage ^Totally unrealistic and breaks the immersion. Also will body armor play a role? I've seen a guy get hit by an (SVD? 7.62x54mm) round center mass, get knocked down, but was OK because the bullet didn't penetrate his armor.

2014-02-22, 00:41	#2
Limeni[BiH] Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 2,410 Bosnia and Herzegowina Location: Sarajevo	Re: Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor. I hope not.

2014-02-22, 13:56	#4
Brainlaag Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 3,909 Italy	Re: Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor. I really hope they'll go for modular damage ala RO2 with fully working body armor.
Brainlaag Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 3,909 Italy

2014-02-24, 15:04	#7
MikeDude Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 927 Netherlands Location: Holland, Utrecht.	Re: Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor. As long as it is not based on chance, it would be cool.

2014-02-24, 18:50	#9
baltimore Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 607 Romania Location: cluj	Re: Will guns and bullets do realistic damage? Body armor. deviation in PR2? huh?