|
PR:Falklands General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality Falklands modification. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2014-06-26, 16:16 | #1 |
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Argentina
Location: Germany
|
Update?
I just wanted to know what?s the status on the minimod. I know that asking for a date of release is not possible to answer, but maybe a % of how much is done would be ok.
Btw, I saw a couple of vids on youtube about it, and it looks just awesome. BUT there were no paved roads in the islands at the time of the war, at least not in the countryside (just Port Stanley had a couple of streets) |
2014-06-26, 17:38 | #2 | ||
Retired PR Developer
|
Re: Update
Quote:
Quote:
Shooting Pheasants with a Drainpipe - Project Reality Forums Guess the Object - Project Reality Forums Don't you think you could have brought something a little more practical? - Project Reality Forums Ye I'm aware there was only paved roads in and around Stanley during the war but the main reason why I did paved roads over dirt roads since making roads was a pain in the ass to being with, since this is mesh terrain rather than normal terrain and as such, they had to be modelled into the terrain and doing that with dirt roads would have required loads of custom textures for each intersection, or a seriously low quality dirt road just painted onto the colour map so for the sake of simplicity I went with paved roads | ||
|
|||
2014-06-26, 18:41 | #3 |
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Argentina
Location: Germany
|
Re: Update?
Well thanks for all those links, I had only seen the 'Guess the object' one. And I also like the idea of making of this thread the one of updates and discussion for now.
Concerning the roads, indeed, they are the reason why there where no tanks fighting in falklands, but paved ones are surely easier to make and should make the map a bit more dynamic. Just thanks for the mod and keep up the amazing job! |
2014-06-26, 21:05 | #4 |
PR:BF2 Developer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,087
Australia
|
Re: Update?
^tank. (barely) |
|
|
2014-06-26, 21:12 | #5 |
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Argentina
Location: Germany
|
Re: Update?
Exactly, barely. A Scorpion is not even considered a light tank as far as I know, neither does the Panhard, used by the argentines. Still, there were not clashes between these kind of armoured cars, and their use was pretty limited, mainly, because most of the war was fought on hills.
|
2014-06-26, 22:07 | #6 | |||
Retired PR Developer
|
Re: Update?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The FV107 Scimitar is primarily a reconnaissance vehicle but is occasion classed as a light tank too (not as much as the Scorpion) but was again, mainly used as a light tank during the later part of the war with the Scorpion. The Panhard AML 90 however is just classed as an Armoured Scout Car, mainly due it it having wheels rather than tracks since its fire power is pretty considerable for such a role. There also was a small armour engagement during the Falklands War between Argentine AML-90s and V101 Scorpions and FV107 Scimitars of the Blues and Royals during the Battle of Wireless Ridge, but there is little info on the net about actually what happened during this engagement. Also the Brits did use their CVR(T)s pretty effectively during the war after Goose Green as their NV capability and firepower was extremely valuable at assaulting the hills at night. | |||
|
||||
Last edited by [R-DEV]Rhino; 2014-06-26 at 22:13..
|
2014-06-27, 15:04 | #7 |
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Argentina
Location: Germany
|
Re: Update?
I seriously cant argue with you about military equipment and vehicles, you have three times more knowledge than I do. If you say a Scorpion is a light tank, then it is, I was wrong.
Argentina only landed 8 Recon vehicles, it was not just a logistical problem, but the use that a tank could be given at the Isles was very reduced. We had back then (and still have a modernized version of it) the SK-105 Kuirassier. Think about it, a CVR like the Scimitar could move through the hills and provide cover, but not a SK, the Kuirassier could have never go through that rocky terrain. Maintaining them only to be used from Stanley to Wireless Ridge would have been just retarded. The 8 Panhards were on "stand by" the hole war. The last week they were ordered to cover the retreat of our 5th Marine Regiment, but nothing more, they only shot a few rounds just to check the distance between them and british positions. |
2014-06-27, 15:49 | #8 | |||
Retired PR Developer
|
Re: Update?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Photos would also suggest that there where quite a few deployed to the Falklands, not that you can't see more than six in any one photo but there are a lot of photos of them all stacked up in different locations, some well outside of Stanley even: This video is in Spanish but may also have some info in. BTW if there is anything in there to support an armoured engagement between CVR(T)s and the AML-90 would be good to know | |||
|
||||
2014-06-28, 10:55 | #9 |
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Argentina
Location: Germany
|
Re: Update?
The 181st Recon Squadron was a unit formed specifically for the war. As Argentina couln't take a hole regiment, they took some vehicles from the recoinassance squadron from various units. 6 of these came from the 3rd Armoured Regiment, 4 from the 10th Armoured Regiment and 2 from the 9th Armoured Regiment. Only 8 of these were landed in the war, the other 4 from the 10th didn't arrive in time (the other 2 regiments were in Patagonia, whilst the 10th was in the middle of the country) and never got to Falklands because of the british blockade.
Summary, the 181st was composed by 12 Panhard from varios regiments but only 8 of these got to Falklands. |
2014-08-05, 03:55 | #10 |
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Japan
Location: Nagano
|
Re: Update?
It looks like they put a tank turret on an armored car. Does it roll back 20 meters every time you fire it?
|
Tags |
update |
|
|