|
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,076
![]()
Location: Vancouver
|
![]()
so just a quick question for all of you, do you think the Chinese QBZ-95 assault rifle is perhaps a bit too stable? mind you i'm usually on the butt end of that rifle. i've recently noticed that with this rifle i can easily take out half a squad before they even hit me once and thats with them all firing back at me, and vice versa with any other teams rifles its hard to hit anything past your second shot in semi (this is asuming you're firing at a quick rate tap tap tap). any thoughts on this?
|
Information in the hands of a critical thinker is invaluable, information alone is simply dangerous.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,483
![]()
Location: Leeds
|
![]()
You may just enjoy using that weapon, everyone has favourites. I find that I am particularly proficient with the M4 Aimpoint but that does not mean it is any better or worse than the other rifles in-game.
The QBZ does combine full auto with a decent caliber (stopping power) and a bullpup configuration which means recoil is lower than other weapons. So yes it is very good, but not to the point that it is not balanced with the other main assault rifles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,280
![]() |
![]()
I have to agree I find the QBZ-95 more stable than the others but it might just be personal preference. Someone could always check the code to verify any differences if they were really interested.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,000
![]()
Location: norfolk
|
![]()
IIRC all rifles in game have same deviation, dunno about recoil.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
![]()
Strangely enough I do find the Scope QBZ a lucky gun, I'm aweful with the ironsight version, however I'm great with the ironsights of the other rifles and aweful with teh scope versions
The truth is out there |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Retired PR Developer
|
![]() |
![]() [R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,231
![]()
Location: In da hood
|
![]()
I love the QBZ, my fave gun
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 180
![]()
Location: Skane
|
![]()
I too find the QBZ95 too feel a lot more accurate. However, I don't know if there really is a difference between it and the M4.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,116
![]()
Location: Cerkno
|
![]()
Its nice, compact, feels kindof "heavy", just right (the ironisht version).
the Tavor si similar with the aimpoint but its feels too weak ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,467
![]()
Location: Perth
|
![]()
The QBZ-95 is pretty much the L85A2 with 5% more muzzle climb and a slightly less powerful scope. The cartridge does slightly more damage than 5.56x45mm NATO however it is not enough to reduce the rounds needed to drop someone. The QBZ-95 also has slightly more recoil than the M4. All the assault rifles/battle rifles have the same deviation except for the AK-47, the AKS-47 and the AKS-74U which have a cone of fire with a diameter which is a third larger when looking down the sights.
|
![]() |
Last edited by nedlands1; 2010-03-10 at 01:14..
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
accuracy, qbz95 |
|
|