2015-11-05, 04:08 | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 55
United States of America
|
Re: Russian Optics
|
2015-11-07, 14:25 | #42 |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,377
Netherlands Antilles
|
Re: Russian Optics
|
2015-11-07, 22:40 | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 55
United States of America
|
Re: Russian Optics
Who?
Just because your "logic" got turned around that does not mean I am shitposting. Here's the thing: because there are Russian SF that use various optics and there are SF that do not, whether SF uses optics has nothing to do with whether optics are better or worse. So, the one closest to shitposting is you. If you were really trying to argue against the claim that ironsight is better(instead of shitposting), you would have posted pictures of "polite people" in Crimea with PK1...etc. |
Last edited by Armchairman_Mao; 2015-11-07 at 22:48..
|
2015-11-12, 12:32 | #44 | |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,377
Netherlands Antilles
|
Re: Russian Optics
Quote:
| |
2016-01-04, 22:45 | #45 |
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 226
United States of America
Location: Washington (STATE)
|
Re: Russian Optics
I do agree that the 1P29 optic is extremely bulky and hard to use for infantry, but also agree that iron sights are just fine for most engagements.
However, the PKP Pecheneg has a 1P78, so why not move it over to the AK-74M as well? There seems to be plenty of evidence of it being at least somewhat widespread (1P78 5.45x39, pics of Crimea at bottom), and it has a much better reticle but slightly lower zoom (2.8x). |
|
|
Tags |
optics, russian |
|
|