Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal

=SAGA=Ura · 2012-06-13, 01:39

I have just watched a video about it and found it's thermal image should be black and white. It is green in PR, so can you fix it in PR 1.0?

=HCM= Shwedor · 2012-06-13, 04:05

HJ-8 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I do believe, if you are refering to the stationary Firebase emplacement, that it is the HJ-8 (temporary placeholder for Russian faction's AT armament).

Jolly · 2012-06-13, 04:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by =HCM= Shwedor

HJ-8 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I do believe, if you are refering to the stationary Firebase emplacement, that it is the HJ-8 (temporary placeholder for Russian faction's AT armament).

You mean Russian Forces is using Chinese HJ8 as their stationary Anti-tank in PR?

A little be off-topic, Russian Forces is using a quiet different way in battle?

Rhino · 2012-06-13, 06:47

Its a place holder until someone makes a proper deplorable AT for the Russians.... The MEC shouldn't be using the HJ-8 either but they are.

dtacs · 2012-06-13, 07:35

The MEC are using the Milan, which is realistic AFAIK.

Rhino · 2012-06-13, 08:07

oh ye forgot that one, even thou I was the one who implemented it

They use to use the HJ-8, before the Milan

Well if you still want an example, Brits shouldn't be using the TOW

dtacs · 2012-06-13, 10:20

Do the British have an equivalent?

Von_Gnome · 2012-06-13, 10:50

Wikipedia says the brittish used MILAN before changing them for Javelins

Jolly · 2012-06-13, 12:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von_Gnome

Wikipedia says the brittish used MILAN before changing them for Javelins

Would like to see Javelin in PR:BF2, but it might affect game balance...

Rhino · 2012-06-13, 14:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtacs

Do the British have an equivalent?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von_Gnome

Wikipedia says the brittish used MILAN before changing them for Javelins

Ye, we use to use the MILAN, which is the deployable AT for the Brits in PR:F, but now the Javelin has basically replaced it and we don't really have a stationary AT anymore as the Javelin dose the same job, but is more flexible

2012-06-13, 01:39	#1
=SAGA=Ura Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 30 China Location: Shanghai，China	Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal I have just watched a video about it and found it's thermal image should be black and white. It is green in PR, so can you fix it in PR 1.0?

2012-06-13, 04:05	#2
=HCM= Shwedor Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 430 United States of America Location: Virginia	Re: Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal HJ-8 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia I do believe, if you are refering to the stationary Firebase emplacement, that it is the HJ-8 (temporary placeholder for Russian faction's AT armament).

2012-06-13, 06:47	#4
Rhino Retired PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 47,448 United Kingdom Location: Somerset - UK Blog Entries: 45	Re: Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal Its a place holder until someone makes a proper deplorable AT for the Russians.... The MEC shouldn't be using the HJ-8 either but they are.

2012-06-13, 08:07	#6
Rhino Retired PR Developer Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 47,448 United Kingdom Location: Somerset - UK Blog Entries: 45	Re: Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal oh ye forgot that one, even thou I was the one who implemented it They use to use the HJ-8, before the Milan Well if you still want an example, Brits shouldn't be using the TOW

2012-06-13, 10:20	#7
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 5,467 Australia Location: Sydney	Re: Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal Do the British have an equivalent?

2012-06-13, 07:35	#5
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 5,467 Australia Location: Sydney	The MEC are using the Milan, which is realistic AFAIK.

2012-06-13, 10:50	#8
Von_Gnome Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 556 Sweden Location: Vastmanland	Re: Russian Anti-tank missile 9M133 kornet-E's thermal Wikipedia says the brittish used MILAN before changing them for Javelins