|
PR:BF2 Suggestions Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2010-07-22, 14:01 | #1 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,579
Ireland
Location: dublin
|
Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Im suggeting a more realistic approch when it comes to destroying the last cache.When its the last cache i alot of times i see people rushing armour to the cache wihtout any care as evryone is like "its the last cache who cares" and if infantary see the cache in a room(with a lot of infantary) they will try and just run in drop incedriy down. So im suggesting that when the last cache has been taken the team has to all fall back to the main base. It would make it more tactical as people would rely on assets to evac infantary back to main away from the cache. From this time the main will be blokced from spawining in so people dont just sucide back to main. The only spawn points open at this time are Rally points and Fobs.90% of players have to make it back to main.
|
Last edited by myles; 2010-07-22 at 14:47..
|
2010-07-22, 14:40 | #2 |
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 534
Turkey
Location: Istanbul
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Edit: Apology. Got the suggestion wrong.
|
Last edited by alberto_di_gio; 2010-07-22 at 18:48..
|
2010-07-22, 14:41 | #3 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,579
Ireland
Location: dublin
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Sorry explain how it would leave Blufor completley without vechicles?
|
2010-07-22, 14:44 | #4 |
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Finland
Location: kotka
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
so when 31 players are in mainbase and just one lonewolf rambo is in field still,so will be there rescueoperation?
i kind like this but sounds little hardcoded. |
2010-07-22, 14:47 | #5 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,579
Ireland
Location: dublin
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
I forgot to put it in but ill edit it now i was going to say if like 90% of players have to make it back to main. might be hardocded
|
2010-07-22, 14:49 | #6 |
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,467
Australia
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
You've been here awhile, when making suggestions try to divide it up into reasons for and against, and at least give a nutshell for those with little time or those who just CBF reading a whole post.
So if I've got this right: Once the final cache has been destroyed, everybody returns to main. Why? In a realistic combat situation, no military is going to pull out of the area they have just taken. They would reinforce it, bring in supplies, ensure security against counter attack, and specifically for insurgency, organize the civilian populace. But unfortunately that isn't really possible unless the BLUFOR are required to 'build FOBs around the map in certain places, within a time limit or something. |
2010-07-22, 15:02 | #7 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,579
Ireland
Location: dublin
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Quote:
Also there is no rule on layout on a thread | |
2010-07-22, 15:13 | #8 |
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 73
United Kingdom
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Nah, the last cache is fine with everyone suicide charging it. Makes a nice change of pace for both sides.
|
2010-07-22, 15:19 | #9 |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,000
United Kingdom
Location: norfolk
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
|
|
|
2010-07-22, 15:19 | #10 | |
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,467
Australia
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Last cache Insurgency suggestion
Quote:
I'm not saying there are rules, but a decent layout is a bit better than a paragraph with little effort put into punctuation, makes it easier to read. | |
Tags |
cache, insurgency, suggestion |
|
|